Evaluation
View this rubric for self evaluation. You will go to this site and evaluate yourself and your performance within the group.
Lyrics Book Rubric:
Category |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Critical Thinking | Consistently identifies the themes, tone, and message of the era. Shows clear understanding of connection between the music and the issue of war. Can explain ideas to others.
|
Sometimes identifies the themes, tone, and message of the era. Most of the time shows a level of understanding between the music and the issue of war. Could explain parts of the connection.
|
Rarely identifies the themes, tone, and message of the era. Draws unwarranted or ambiguous conclusions. Explanations are misleading. |
Never identifies the themes, tone, and message of the era. Lacks a level of understanding between the music and the issue of war. Could not explain the connection. |
| Uses Technology as a Mindtool | Uses technology as a way to access information, and interpret, organize and represent personal knowledge. clearly sees technology as a way to problem solve. | Sometimes uses technology as a way to access, interpret and organize information. Occasionally sees technology as a way to problem solve. | Some basic technology is analyzed. Use of technology confines the student to appropriate tools to complete task but only as directed by the teacher. | Student does not interact with technology at a functioning level, and is hindered by the process. |
| Content | Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. Shows connections between the war and the culture and what society needs to do to cope with effects of war. | Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Shows a fair understanding of the connection between the war and the culture. Can offer some suggestions about what a society needs to do to cope with effects of war. | Includes essential information about the topic but there are several factual errors. Sees the content but has a difficult time making the connections between the effects of war on the people. | Content is minimal or there are several factual errors. Does not attempt to make the connections between the effects of war on the people. |
| Organization | Content is well organized using heading or bulleted lists to group related material. | Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed. | Content is logically organized for the most part. | There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts. |
Wiki Evaluation Rubric:
| Category | 4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Shares Information | Collects a great deal of information - all relates to the topic and relays this information using the wiki. | Collects some basic information - most relates to the topic and relays this information using the wiki. | Collects very little information - some relates to the topic and relays very little information using the wiki. | Does not collect information that relates to the topic and does not use the wiki for sharing proper information. |
| Cooperates with Peers | Never argues with peers. | Rarely argues with peers. | Sometimes argues with peers. | Usually argues with peers. |
| Makes Fair Comments | Always helps peers to reach a decision. | Usually considers all views. | Often sides with friends instead of considering all views. | Usually makes comments that are detrimental to the assignment. |
Multimedia Project Rubric:
| Category | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organization | Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material. | Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed. | Content is logically organized for the most part. | There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts. |
| Mechanics | No misspellings or grammatical errors. | Three or fewer misspellings and/or mechanical errors. | Four misspellings and/or grammatical errors. | More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar. |
| Attractiveness | Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation.
|
Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation.
|
Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content. | Use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. but these often distract from the presentation content. |
| Content | Covers topic in depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. | Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good. | Includes essential information about the topic bur there are 1-2 factual errors. | Content is minimal or there are several factual errors. |
| Oral Presentation | Interesting, well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience's attention. | Relatively interesting, rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience's attention. | Delivery not smooth, but able to hold audience's attention most of the time. | Delivery not smooth and audience's attention is lost. |